General News
Delta Govt Urges Calm Over Ibusa–Ogwashi-Uku Boundary Protest
The Delta State Government has appealed for calm following renewed tensions between Ibusa and Ogwashi‑Uku communities in Oshimili North Local Government Area and Aniocha South Local Government Area over an alleged land encroachment dispute.

The call was made by the Chief of Staff, Government House, Asaba, Johnson Erijo, while addressing members of the Ibusa community who staged a peaceful protest at the Government House.
The protesters carried placards demanding enforcement of what they described as subsisting court judgments on the boundary matter. Some of the inscriptions read: “Ogwashi-Uku keep off from Ibusa land,” “Implement Supreme Court judgment,” and “Admiralty University is in Ibusa land.”
The protesters also alleged that the land dispute had been conclusively determined by the courts, citing decisions from the High Court, the Court of Appeal in 1982, and a Supreme Court ruling in Appeal No. SC.32/1985.
Speaking on behalf of Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, Erijo assured the community that the state government had begun taking steps to address the dispute even before the protest was staged.
He urged both communities to maintain peace, stressing that the government would follow due process in handling the matter.
“As a government, there are established procedures for handling issues of this nature. We are already acting on the correspondence received, and appropriate steps have been taken,” Erijo said.
He emphasised that the government would ensure law and order while carefully examining the boundary claims.
Representing the Ibusa community, legal practitioner Peter Lotobi traced the history of the dispute, stating that the boundary matter had been determined by competent courts, including the Supreme Court.
Lotobi urged the state government to intervene decisively to ensure enforcement of existing court judgments in the interest of peace and stability.
The community maintained that it remained peaceful and had cautioned its youths against violence while awaiting government intervention.
The dispute is linked to the presence of Admiralty University of Nigeria, which some protesters claim is located within Ibusa territory.
Authorities assured residents that the state government would arrive at a fair and lawful decision after reviewing all submissions from both communities.
General News
UN Building Bombing: Court Grants Accelerated Hearing as DSS Pushes for Speedy Trial
A Federal High Court in Abuja has approved an application for accelerated hearing in the ongoing trial of five men accused of masterminding the August 26, 2011 bombing of the United Nations building in Abuja.
Justice Emeka Nwite granted the request on Monday following an application by prosecuting counsel, Alex Izinyon (SAN), who invoked the 2022 Practice Direction on terrorism cases issued by the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho.
Izinyon told the court that the case had lingered for nearly a decade and urged the court to allow day-to-day proceedings where possible to ensure a prompt conclusion. He argued that expediting the trial was in the interest of justice and all parties involved. Defence counsel did not oppose the application, and the court subsequently granted it.
The Department of State Services (DSS) is prosecuting Al-Barnawi, also known by several aliases including Kafuri, Naziru, Alhaji Yahaya, Mallam Dauda and Alhaji Tanimu.
He is standing trial alongside Mohammed Bashir Saleh; Umar Mohammed Bello (also known as Datti and Mohammed Salisu); and Yakubu Nuhu (aka Bello Maishayi).
During proceedings, a prosecution witness identified as PW3, a senior operative and computer forensic expert in the DSS Technical Department, testified in a trial-within-trial to determine whether the defendants’ statements were made voluntarily.
Under cross-examination by Bala Dakum, counsel to the second defendant, the witness said he could not recall the exact date a video recording admitted as Exhibit C was made. However, he stated that the interviews of the five defendants took place between 2016 and 2017.
He maintained that the DSS employed professional standards in its investigations, stressing that the forensic recording equipment used complies with the Evidence Act and global best practices.
Responding to claims that the video recording contained gaps, the witness denied any tampering, explaining that the device is designed to be tamper-proof.
According to him, the equipment records simultaneously onto two identical DVDs in real time and automatically triggers a digital closure if paused, preventing further editing.
On allegations that the second defendant was not administered cautionary words before making his statement, the witness clarified that his role was strictly technical to record proceedings and not to participate in questioning.
Nonetheless, he said the video evidence showed that the defendant was informed of his rights, including the option to decline answering questions and access legal counsel, but chose to proceed voluntarily.
The witness also addressed concerns over why only the defendant’s face appeared in the video recording. He explained that it is standard practice not to capture the faces of interviewers for security reasons.
While body parts of interviewers may inadvertently appear during exchanges, he said such portions cannot be edited out due to the integrity safeguards embedded in the recording device.
He further stated that all official interactions between investigators and defendants are submitted to the court. Where security concerns arise from unintended exposure of personnel, the matter is left to the court’s discretion.
Earlier, under cross-examination by F. K. Kamaga, counsel to the first defendant, the witness reiterated that the recording equipment cannot be paused or manipulated mid-session, dismissing suggestions that it could be altered during interviews.
Justice Nwite adjourned further hearing in the matter to March 4, as the court continues the trial-within-trial proceedings.
General News
CSO ACCUSES GOV OTTI OF EXCLUDING IKWUANO COMMUNITIES FROM UMUAHIA CAPITAL TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT
A civil society organisation named Ikwuano Good Governance and Human Rights Project has written to Abia State Governor Alex Otti asserting that portions of Ikwuano LGA has been deliberately and intentionally excluded from its constitutionally rights and development as portions of the Umuahia Capital Territory and Umuahia Capital Development Authority.
In a statement titled ‘RE: EXCLUSION OF PORTIONS OF IKWUANO LG FROM UMUAHIA CAPITAL TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT’, the Executive Director of IGGHRP, Mr Tony Icheku argued that what seemed an oversight by previous negligent administration appears to have transformed into a deliberate and intentional administrative exclusion and relegation of these portions of Ikwuano LGA from developmental projections of UCDA.
In the statement where he listed the affected communities to include Ndoro – Umugbalu – Amawom – Umudike, Icheku further maintained that by excluding these communities which boasts of high population density first from the recent roads rehabilitation and reconstruction of roads leading in and out of Umuahia and from the recently introduced Green Shuttle Bus Service routes, the Otti-led administration appears to have keyed into the mistake of previous negligent administrations.
According to him, among several important institutions on the Ikwuano portions of Umuahia Capital Territory include the Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike; National Roots Crop Research Institute, campus of the Abia State University; Government College, Umuahia plus several secondary and primary schools plus medical facilities.
Icheku appealed to Gov Otti to reverse the mistake of the past and incorporate these communities in his usual speedy interventions in spreading socio-economic development to all books and crannies of Abia State.

The letter reads in full:
Ikwuano Good Governance and Human Rights Project
March 2, 2025
His Excellency, Dr Alex Otti
Executive Governor, Abia State
Government House
Umuahia
His Excellency,
RE: EXCLUSION OF PORTIONS OF IKWUANO LG FROM UMUAHIA CAPITAL TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT
We write to you in the consciousness of the New Abia spirit which has ushered unquantifiable socio-economic to our dear State within such a short period.
We however wish to draw your attention to what appears to be deliberate exclusion of portions of Ikwuano LGA from the constitutionally designated Umuahia Capital Territory masterplan. Being part of the masterplan of Umuahia Capital Territory, this portions of Ikwuano LG should benefit from the development programmes and projects of Umuahia Capital Development Authority. Unfortunately, such has not been the practice since Aug. 21, 1991 creation of Abia State and subsequent development of the Capital Territory masterplan.
From our observations, what seemed an oversight by previous negligent administration appears to have transformed into a deliberate and intentional administrative exclusion and relegation of these portions of Ikwuano LGA from developmental projections of UCDA.
First, we have observed that these Ikwuano portions of Umuahia Capital Territory were deliberately excluded from the massive road rehabilitation and reconstruction of major roads leading into and out of Umuahia metropolis by His Excellencys administration.
Just like Tower to Onuimo, these portions of Ikwuano LG are part of the Federal road network, but that did not stop your administration from speedy work on the Tower-Onuimo section of the road.
Sir, we wish to remind His Excellency, that the Umuahia-Ikwuano road was in worse condition than the Tower-Onuimo road whose reconstruction and rehabilitation was speedily embarked upon. Thankfully, your government has taken over the road finally. Thank you Sir.
Secondly, we are constrained to write His Excellency over the deliberate and intentional exclusion of Ikwuano portions of the Umuahia Capital Territory from the Green Shuttle Bus Services.
If under the Umuahia route, there are Ubakala – Isigate route; Isigate to Tower route; and Isigate to Ohafia route, we cannot find justiciable reason for the absence of Oboro – Isigate route.
Its part of Oboro clan, beginning from Methodist High School, coming from Ndoro that fall within the Umuahia Capital Territory. Find enclosed sign post declaring this fact.
His Excellency must be aware that beginning from Ndoro – Umugbalu – Amawom – Umudike – Ahia Eke are clusters of fast growing population which can generate enough revenue for the Green Bus project.
On this stretch of road are the Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike; National Roots Crop Research Institute, campus of the Abia State University; Government College, Umuahia; A large Catholic Church community comprising a seminary, secondary and primary schools plus medical facilities.
In our consideration, we assumed that some of the information we have proffered may not have been properly brought to His Excellencys attention, and we hope that our doing so now would right the wrongs of the past regarding the exclusion of this portions of Ikwuano LG from Umuahia Capital Territory development.
We equally extend our appreciation to His Excellency for the interventions in hitherto abandoned inter and intra community road network across Ikwuano LG.
We look forward to His Excellencys usual speedy interventions in spreading socio-economic development to all books and crannies of Abia State.
Accept Sir, the compliments of our high regards.
yours sincerely
e-signed
Tony Icheku
Executive Director
Ikwuano Good Governance and Human Rights Project
Cc:
i. Hon Boniface Isienye, Abia State House of Assembly
ii. Hon. Commissioner for Information, Abia State
iii. Hon Commissioner for Transport, Abia State
iv. Hon Commissioner for Finance, Abia State
v. Executive Chairman, Ikwuano LGA
vi. Director-General, Ministry of Finance Inc., MOFI, Abia State
General News
EL-RUFAI FAMILY ACCUSES ICPC OF WEAPONIZING RIGHT TO SILENCE IN SMEAR CAMPAIGN
Hon. Mohammed Bello El Rufai, a member of the House of Representatives, has accused the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission of waging a smear campaign against Malam Nasir El Rufai, his father, by weaponizing his constitutional right to silence. In a lengthy statement issued on Monday and signed on behalf of the El-Rufai family, Mohammed Bello El-Rufai said it was deeply unfortunate that a constitutionally established agency had descended into what can only be described as a circus of chicanery, alleging that the ICPC was prosecuting a media war rather than adhering to the rule of law.
Addressing claims by the Commission that Nasir El-Rufai refused to cooperate with investigators, the lawmaker said the allegation betrayed a misunderstanding of basic constitutional protections. He argued that the 1999 Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to remain silent, insisting that exercising that right cannot lawfully be construed as non-cooperation or guilt.

Our father has consistently told law enforcement agencies: Charge me if you have anything against me. You have had more than two years to investigate me. Take me to court, the statement said, adding that the ICPCs inability to do so explained what the family described as lies and obfuscation.
Furthermore, the family alleged that the entire search was based on a forged and legally defective warrant, purportedly issued by a magistrate who lacked the jurisdiction of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory. They said their lawyers had already challenged the warrant in court, arguing that any evidence arising from it was inadmissible.
Describing the ICPCs conduct as a credibility deficit, the statement accused the agency of forgery, abuse of office and the peddling of falsehoods, and claimed it was acting on behalf of unnamed political interests. The family said it would pursue all available legal remedies and expressed confidence that the Nigerian judiciary would uphold their rights.
Mohammed Bello El-Rufai, who represents Kaduna North Federal Constituency and chairs the House Committee on Banking Regulations, signed the statement on March 2, 2026, describing himself as a proud son of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai.
The ICPC has yet to respond publicly to the latest allegations.
