Connect with us

Judiciary

Nigeria Wins $6.2m Arbitration Against European Tech Firm

Published

on

Share

Nigeria has secured a major legal victory after an international tribunal dismissed a $6.2 million claim filed by European Dynamics UK Ltd over a stalled national e-Procurement (eGP) project supported by the World Bank.

The contractor had claimed $2.4 million for alleged milestone completions, $3 million in general damages, and an additional $800,000 in settlement claims. Prior to the current leadership of the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), there were discussions around an out-of-court settlement. However, the Bureau chose to proceed with arbitration, insisting that payments must strictly reflect verified value delivered.

At the centre of the dispute was the User Acceptance Test (UAT), which the BPP said revealed significant functional deficiencies in the software system. The tribunal agreed, ruling that delivery in software contracts is only complete upon satisfactory performance validation.

The tribunal also rejected claims that the Bureau approved merging multiple project phases into one, noting that such restructuring would distort the contract’s phased payment framework.

In a final ruling not subject to appeal, Sole Arbitrator Mrs ‘Funmi Roberts dismissed all claims, saving Nigeria an estimated ₦9.3 billion in potential liabilities.

Nigeria’s legal team was led by Johnson & Wilner LLP, with Basil Udotai, Esq., spearheading the defence.

BPP Director-General Dr Adebowale Adedokun described the outcome as a signal that Nigeria “can no longer be taken for granted,” while Attorney-General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), said the victory shows it is “no longer business as usual” in protecting the country’s interests.

See also  THIRTY FOUR FEDERAL HIGH COURT JUDGE NOMINEES FAIL INTEGRITY TEST, DISQUALIFIED
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Court Sentences Winners Chapel Pastor to Death for Landlord’s Murder

Published

on

Share

 

An Akwa Ibom State High Court has sentenced a 29-year-old resident pastor of Living Faith Church Worldwide, popularly known as Winners Chapel, to death by hanging for the murder of his landlord.

The convict, Emmanuel Umoh, served as the Resident Pastor at the Ifa Ikot Ubo–Ifa Ikot Okpon branch of the church. Delivering judgment on Thursday, Justice Gabriel Ette found him guilty of killing Gabriel Bassey Edward, a 500-level Civil Engineering student of the University of Uyo.

Academic records released after Edward’s death showed that he graduated with First Class honours.

Background

Court documents revealed that Edward had moved into his late mother’s property at Ifa Ikot Ubo to safeguard the estate and stay closer to school. Before her passing in December 2019, his mother had established a nursery school within the compound.

Edward lived in a two-bedroom flat attached to a long hall in the compound with his younger brother. The hall, originally constructed for school activities, was later rented to the church for worship at an annual rent of ₦150,000. The arrangement received the approval of Edward’s father, Emana Bassey Edward, a retired school principal. The church commenced use of the hall before completing payment, and Umoh was subsequently posted to the branch as its first Resident Pastor.

Circumstances of the Killing

The court heard that on December 21, 2020, Umoh was seen entering the compound. Neighbours later reported hearing repeated shouts of “Jesus” from within the premises. Shortly afterwards, he was seen leaving wearing a white garment stained with blood, which he claimed was due to a fall while attempting to hang a banner.

See also  WHITE HOUSE SLAMS JUDGES AS "JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS" AFTER COURT RULINGS GO AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

On December 26, 2020, a day after Christmas, Edward’s decomposing body was discovered in his room. The body, wrapped in a mat, bore multiple deep cuts allegedly inflicted with a butcher’s knife recovered at the scene.

Umoh was arrested as the last person seen with the deceased and for having blood stains on his clothing without a satisfactory explanation. He was charged with one count of murder and arraigned on December 6, 2021, where he pleaded not guilty.

Trial Proceedings

The prosecution called six witnesses, including the deceased’s father. He told the court that after the church began using the hall, the pastor sought permission to store church chairs and other items in Edward’s flat because the hall lacked doors and windows. The request was granted.

The arrangement later created tension, as Edward had to return home whenever the pastor required access to the stored items, even when he was away, without compensation for the inconvenience. Following complaints, Edward’s father directed him to give the pastor a spare key.

Subsequently, personal belongings of Edward’s late mother — including clothes, plates, and other valuables — reportedly went missing. Suspicion fell on the pastor due to his access to the key. When questioned, he claimed the key had been lost.

The issue was reported to the church’s Senior Pastor, Owoidoho Etuk Akpan, who testified as a defence witness. He informed the court that he gave the family ₦5,000 to replace the locks, after which no further items were reported missing.

The court also heard that friction later developed between the pastor and the deceased over rent allegedly paid for the hall and intended for repairs.

See also  TRUMP'S FELONY CONVICTION: WHAT IT MEANS FOR HIS RIGHTS AND FUTURE

Judgment

In a judgment lasting over two hours, Justice Ette described the case as deeply painful, recalling the late mother’s efforts in building the property for educational purposes.

The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, stressing that life is sacred and that anyone who betrays public trust  particularly in a religious setting must face the full weight of the law.

Emmanuel Umoh was accordingly sentenced to death by hanging.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Third Nigerian Extradited to U.S. Over Sextortion Case Linked to Young Man’s Death

Published

on

Share

 

The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, David Metcalf, has announced the extradition of a third Nigerian national to the United States in connection with a sexual extortion scheme that allegedly led to the death of a young man in the district.

The announcement was made by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The suspect, Afeez Olatunji Adewale, 26, was extradited from Nigeria on Friday, February 13, 2026, to face charges stemming from the alleged sextortion operation. He is charged by indictment with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Adewale made his initial appearance in federal court in Philadelphia before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Adewale was arrested in Nigeria on August 17, 2023, during a broader Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) operation targeting individuals accused of sexually extorting minors in the United States.

The extradition was coordinated with the assistance of the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs, the FBI Legal Attaché in Abuja, and the FBI, which took Adewale into custody upon his arrival in the United States.

U.S. authorities acknowledged the critical support provided by Nigerian security agencies in securing the extradition. Notably involved were Nigeria’s Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, the Federal Ministry of Justice’s International Criminal Justice Cooperation Department, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Adewale’s extradition follows those of his co-defendants, Imoleayo Samuel Aina, also known as “Alice Dave,” 27, and Samuel Olasunkanmi Abiodun, 26, who were extradited to the United States in August 2024.

See also  WHITE HOUSE SLAMS JUDGES AS "JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS" AFTER COURT RULINGS GO AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Abiodun pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges. In June 2025, he was sentenced to five years in prison by United States District Judge Joel H. Slomsky.

Aina later pleaded guilty to multiple offences, including cyberstalking, interstate threats to injure reputation, receiving proceeds of extortion, money laundering conspiracy, and wire fraud. In October 2025, Judge Slomsky sentenced him to six years in prison.

The case was investigated by the FBI Philadelphia Field Office’s Fort Washington Resident Agency in collaboration with the Abington Township Police Department.

Prosecution is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Patrick Brown.

Authorities stressed that the charges and allegations contained in the indictment against Adewale are accusations. He is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

 

Continue Reading

Government

ECOWAS Commission, Nigeria Dragged to Court Over Alleged Unlawful Nomination of Judges

Published

on

Share

 

The Trustees of the Centre for Community Law (CCL), a Nigerian-registered non-governmental organisation, alongside Professor Amos Osaiogbovo Enabulele, have filed a suit against the ECOWAS Commission and the Federal Government of Nigeria over what they describe as the “unlawful” nomination and appointment of judges to the ECOWAS Court of Justice.

The suit was filed at the ECOWAS Court in Abuja on February 6, 2026, and formally registered on February 12, 2026, with reference number ECW/CCJ/APP/08/26.

The CCL and Professor Enabulele are listed as Applicants, while the ECOWAS Commission and the Federal Republic of Nigeria are named as Respondents.

Alleged Violation of Legal Provisions

In the originating application, the Applicants argue that the process for nominating judges to the ECOWAS Court failed to comply with mandatory provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the ECOWAS Community Judicial Council and Article 3(1) of the Protocol on the ECOWAS Court of Justice.

They are asking the Court to determine whether it is lawful for ECOWAS Member States, particularly Nigeria, to nominate and appoint judges without strictly adhering to prescribed procedures, including wide publicity of vacancies and transparent, merit-based selection processes.

According to the Applicants, the ECOWAS Commission requested nominations from Member States without ensuring compliance with established rules designed to guarantee transparency, competitiveness and merit.

Reference to ECOWAS Communiqué

The Applicants rely on paragraph 47(xi) of the Final Communiqué issued at the Sixty-Eighth Ordinary Session of the ECOWAS Authority of Heads of State and Government held on December 14, 2025, in Abuja.

The communiqué, attached as Exhibit C, indicated that Nigeria, Benin, Liberia, The Gambia and Togo were selected to nominate the next college of judges for the ECOWAS Court.

See also  WHITE HOUSE SLAMS JUDGES AS "JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS" AFTER COURT RULINGS GO AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Following that allocation, the Applicants allege that the nomination process in Nigeria and at the level of the ECOWAS Commission did not comply with requirements for public advertisement and transparent selection, thereby excluding qualified candidates and undermining due process.

Call for Urgent Intervention

Professor Enabulele, a Professor of Public International Law and Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, and the CCL, a non-profit advocacy organisation focused on monitoring compliance with ECOWAS laws and promoting accountability within Community institutions, argue that urgent judicial intervention is necessary.

They warn that unless the Court steps in, individuals may be appointed to the ECOWAS Court bench without following proper procedures, potentially affecting the integrity, independence and credibility of the regional judicial institution.

In addition to the substantive suit, the Applicants have filed an application for expedited procedure pursuant to Article 59 of the Rules of the Community Court of Justice, urging the Court to hear and determine the matter urgently.

They maintain that the Respondents are already taking active steps to nominate and appoint judges and that any delay could render the case nugatory if appointments are concluded before judgment.

The Applicants have also filed a motion seeking interim restraining orders to halt any further steps in the nomination and appointment process pending the determination of the suit.

Reliefs Sought

Among the reliefs sought are declarations that the nomination and appointment process must strictly comply with the Rules of Procedure of the ECOWAS Community Judicial Council and the Protocol on the ECOWAS Court of Justice.

See also  Mexican Police To Deploy Robot Dogs For Security At 2026 World Cup

They are also seeking orders compelling the publication of vacancies for judicial positions and directing the Respondents to publish the names and curriculum vitae of nominated candidates to enable Community citizens to comment.

The Applicants further ask the Court to prohibit the Community Judicial Council from accepting nominations obtained without proper advertisement and to issue such further orders as may be necessary to preserve the integrity of the Court.

The Respondents are required to file their defence within 15 days of service, failing which the Applicants may proceed and judgment may be delivered in their absence.

The Centre for Community Law said the suit is aimed at safeguarding the rule of law within ECOWAS institutions and ensuring that judicial appointments to the Community Court reflect transparency, merit and strict compliance with governing legal instruments.

No hearing date has been fixed.

Continue Reading