EFCC Reopens Atiku Allegations Probe After Fresh Petition

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has reopened an investigation into allegations involving former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar following a fresh petition by former House of Representatives member, Ehiozuwa Johnson Agbonayinma.

The commission reportedly acknowledged receipt of the petition, dated August 27, 2026, on September 1, confirming that investigations had commenced.

Agbonayinma, through his lawyer, Chief Hannibal Uwaifo (SAN), is seeking a review of allegations linked to an earlier investigation involving the former vice-president.

As part of the process, the EFCC invited the former lawmaker to its headquarters in Jabi, Abuja, on October 12, to formally adopt his petition and respond to questions from investigators.

Agbonayinma reportedly arrived at about 9:58 a.m. and left at approximately 4:07 p.m. after the interview.

The commission’s acknowledgement letter, referenced CR:3000/EFCC/HQ/SDC-2/VOL.3/398, was cited as part of the ongoing investigative process.

Speaking with journalists, Agbonayinma said his petition sought to revisit an investigation conducted during the tenure of former EFCC chairman, Nuhu Ribadu.

He argued that the allegations required renewed scrutiny in the interest of accountability, transparency and the rule of law.

“I want to thank Nigerians, the EFCC and those praying for me in this struggle. The laws are meant for both the rich and the poor. After the EFCC has done a fantastic job, it should not be kept under the table,” he said.

The former lawmaker maintained that reporting alleged wrongdoing was a constitutional responsibility, insisting that no individual should be considered above the law.

He also disclosed that he had petitioned United States President Donald Trump, urging him to give attention to the allegations against Atiku.

However, the reported reopening of the investigation does not establish that Atiku Abubakar committed any offence. The allegations remain subject to investigation, and no conclusion on their merits can be drawn solely from the EFCC’s reported action.