DSS Clarifies Defamation Suit Against SERAP, Says Case Was Filed by Operatives

The Department of State Services (DSS) has clarified that the defamation suit resulting in a N100 million judgment against the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) was instituted by two of its operatives in their personal capacities and not by the agency itself.

In a statement issued on May 6, 2026, by the Deputy Director, Public Relations and Strategic Communications at the DSS National Headquarters in Abuja, Favour Dozie, the Service said several reports on the matter failed to properly present the facts surrounding the case.

According to the DSS, the controversy stemmed from allegations made by SERAP on September 9, 2024, accusing two DSS operatives of unlawfully invading its Abuja office and harassing staff members.

The Service disclosed that it immediately launched an investigation into the allegations. Following the outcome of the probe, the affected operatives reportedly felt defamed by SERAP’s claims and sought legal redress in their personal capacities after obtaining approval from the Director-General of the DSS to approach the court.

The court subsequently ruled in favour of the operatives, awarding them N100 million in general damages against SERAP.

The court also directed SERAP to publish an apology on its website as well as in Punch and Vanguard newspapers. In addition, the apology is to be aired on Arise Television and Channels Television.

According to the DSS, the court further ruled that the N100 million damages awarded would attract a 10 per cent annual interest rate from May 5, 2026, until full payment is made.

The Service stated that it has a responsibility to protect personnel who carry out their duties lawfully while also disciplining officers found guilty of misconduct or violations of Nigerian laws and internal regulations.

“We have demonstrated this time and again by prosecuting some of our staff for various offences in competent courts,” the statement noted.

The DSS added that it was pleased with the court’s decision, describing it as a remedy to what it called an injustice done to its officers by SERAP.

The agency also reaffirmed its commitment to professionalism and adherence to the rule of law.