# Tags

IT IS DIFFICULT TO IGNORE SEYI TINUBU

By Pelumi Olajengbesi, Esq. Growing up, I had a natural disdain for people in power and, more so, for their children. It was as if they had personally wronged me. My belief was that the children of Nigeria’s political elite lived in a world far removed from the struggles of everyday citizens. Their lives, often characterized by privilege and detachment, seemed to follow a predictable script—overseas education, luxury, and a lack of interest in governance. Public perception reinforced this: while their parents dominated the political landscape, they remained distant, passive in state affairs, and, in some cases, indifferent to the realities of the people. My only consolation was the thought that, eventually, the political class would fade away, and since their children had no vested interest in the country, my generation would naturally take over with little resistance. But something is shifting. A new wave of politically conscious young Nigerians is emerging, and, surprisingly, some of them are from the very class we assumed would never care. Unlike in the past—when the children of the powerful only made headlines for reckless indulgences—there are now familiar faces in political spaces, engaging, mobilizing, and shaping conversations at the grassroots level. This shift challenges the long-held notion that power is simply inherited and that the next generation of the elite will only perpetuate the detachment of their predecessors. Take, for instance, the recent election cycle. There was a time when young people in politics were mostly activists and aspiring politicians from ordinary backgrounds, pushing for change from the outside. But in a surprising turn of events, there was an influx of politically engaged young individuals who, despite their privileged upbringings, immersed themselves in the process. A WhatsApp group created for young political stakeholders ahead of the last election was heavily populated by names one would not expect—sons and daughters of the establishment, not just spectating but actively strategizing, planning, and moving across communities to mobilize. This shift raises important questions. Could it be that the next generation of political leaders in Nigeria is not waiting for power to be handed to them but is instead working to earn legitimacy? Could it be that, for the first time in modern Nigerian history, we are seeing a class of elite youth who understand that influence is no longer just about privilege but about engagement? One figure who has embodied this new dynamic is Seyi Tinubu. Whether one agrees with his politics or not, his active involvement in grassroots engagement is difficult to ignore. Unlike the stereotypical “First Son” image often portrayed in Nigerian politics—one of luxury and excess—his presence on the streets, in communities, and among everyday Nigerians paints a different picture. This is not an endorsement, as he is not contesting for any elective position, but the reality remains that he has stepped into a space many before him have avoided. Beyond visibility, he has also wielded influence in ways that many may not have fully acknowledged. His insistence on youth representation in governance has not gone unnoticed. By carefully navigating the internal politics of an administration with powerful competing blocs, Seyi Tinubu may have played a significant role in ensuring that young people secured a larger share of appointments in this government than in previous ones. It is an outcome that speaks not just to his presence but to his ability to negotiate and push for inclusion in a political landscape where access is often tightly controlled. Democracy, at its core, remains a game of numbers. Political relevance is shaped not just by policies and governance but by the ability to connect, mobilize, and inspire people. In this evolving landscape, those who engage will naturally shape the future—regardless of their background. The days when political privilege alone secured influence may be fading, and what replaces it is a reality where participation, visibility, and legitimacy matter just as much as lineage. Nigeria is watching. The political elite may continue to produce the leaders of tomorrow, but the expectations have changed. Influence is no longer guaranteed—it must be earned. Pelumi Olajengbesi is a Legal Practitioner and the Managing Partner at Law Corridor.

ATTEMPTS TO LINK OBASA’S IMPEACHMENT TO SEYI TINUBU’S GUBER ASPIRATION MISCHIEVOUS (3)

By Ehichioya Ezomon  Removed Speaker Mudashiru Obasa (Agege Constituency 1) of the Lagos State House of Assembly may fail to get back his exalted office, yet, he’s succeeded in forcing an unplanned shift of the House plenary indefinitely, thus sowing tension and confusion among the lawmakers, and splitting the close-knit Governance Advisory Council (GAC) of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the state. This comes after new Speaker Mojisola Meranda (Apapa Constituency 1) formally assumed office on Monday, January 27, 2025, amid majority of the lawmakers chanting: “Madam, continue your work; your work is appealing to us. You are the Speaker, you are the Speaker, you are the Speaker. Speak for Lagos. Continue with your work.”  With Obasa reportedly absent from the Assembly, the lawmakers posed for photographs with Meranda, and accompanied her to the Speaker’s office, “where intense prayers were offered as she settled into her new role.” The plenary was then postponed, “to douse tension in the state.” The lawmakers’ public rallying for Meranda was a “kick in the groin” for Obasa, whose fate appears sealed since losing power on Monday, January 13, and returning from the United States of America to insist that he remains the Speaker until due process is observed in his removal, in line with the amended 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Welcomed back to town on Saturday, January 25, by hundreds of jubilant supporters at the official residence of the Lagos Speaker in the GRA, Ikeja, Obasa slammed his ouster, in absentia, as unconstitutional. In an “A luta continua; vitória é certa” (“The struggle continues; victory is certain”)-like mood, Obasa told his supporters: “I’m still the Speaker until the right thing has been done,” and the crowd cheered.“I am not afraid of being removed. After all, it is not my father’s chieftaincy title. I am representing my people and they have returned me six times. If you want to do anything (remove him), do it well.” Obasa insinuated that were he present in the Assembly, the lawmakers wouldn’t succeed in removing him as Speaker. He queried: “They did the removal all because I was out of the country. Why did they have to break the chamber and use a fake mace to carry out the removal? “If they say they don’t want me anymore, that’s fine, but let them follow due process. I still believe I am the Speaker until the right procedure is followed. Lagos is a special place, we cannot denigrate the state.” Obasa held his ground, as he addressed his 2027 governorship ambition he tactically broached when Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu presented the 2025 Budget proposals to the House, thus sparking the instant flurry of activities in the Lagos polity. Saying, “Having ambition to become a governor is not a sin,” Obasa declared: “However, I said on the floor of the House, when the budget was presented, that I had no thoughts of governorship. But that does not mean I am not qualified or that I lack experience; I still maintain that (stand).” Citing a breach of fair hearing, Obasa claimed he wasn’t given a chance to respond to the charges the House leveled against him, and challenged his colleagues to substantiate the allegations, and afford him a chance to respond. “They (lawmakers) should not discredit an innocent person (Obasa); they should prove their allegations against me. The Lagos State House of Assembly is above the common standard of excellence. I believe in the image of our institution; we must not destroy it and I will never partake in it’s destruction.” Obasa also criticised the Police for “conniving with the lawmakers” to oust him from power, alleging that besides the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Olanrewaju Olawale Ishola, “leading police officers to invade the Assembly,” over 200 policemen allegedly invaded his private residence in Agege, blocked the gate, and prevented members of his family from going out of the house. Obasa referenced other Presiding Officers of the Lagos Assembly removed without deployment of the police. “When former Speaker, Rt Hon. Jokotola Pelumi, was removed, he was in the Assembly and we did not invite policemen. When my sister, former Deputy Speaker of the House, Hon. Adefunmilayo Tejuosho, was removed, we did not invite the police,” Obasa said. Even with his eyes red, Obasa appreciated members of the GAC and Governor Sanwo-Olu, “who is my brother,” and who “always calls me his younger brother,” and thanked President Tinubu, “who will always be my father.” Obasa said he’d been with Tinubu from his days in the Social Democratic Party (SDP) under which Tinubu’s elected Senator in the Third Republic, noting that he never expected to be Speaker in 2015, but “Tinubu supported me even when everyone was against me.” Tinubu’s the acclaimed head of the shadowy and powerful GAC of the Lagos APC, which acts as a clearing house for the party affairs, including elective and appointive positions. But there appears a split in the GAC, as two of its members have criticised Obasa’s ouster as illegal. As reported by The Nation on January 30, a member, Chief M.A. Taiwo, faulted the process of Obasa’s removal, noting that, “The act of the lawmakers is illegal. It shows total disregard and clear disrespect for leadership. The GAC is split over the matter, but we will all defer to our leader, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to resolve the crisis.” Another GAC member, former Senator Anthony Adefuye, described the removal as illegal, stating, “What he (Obasa) is saying is that he was illegally removed, and the procedure was faulty. I agree with him.” Meanwhile, former Lagos Speaker and ex-Minister of State for Health, and Minister of Science and Technology, Dr Olorunnibe Mamora, faults Obasa’s claim that his removal flouts the 1999 Constitution, saying that only the removal of President, Vice President, Governor and Deputy Governor is specified therein, and the procedure to effect the removal. In an interview with Vanguard on January 25, Mamora, who’s Speaker from 1999 to 2003, and Senator from 2003 to 2011,

ATIKU SLAMS FULL MILITARY HONOURS ACCORDED PRESIDENT’S SON, CALLS FOR PROBE

Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President of Nigeria and the nation’s leading opposition figure, has strongly condemned the recent military parade involving Seyi Tinubu, the son of President Bola Tinubu. He has demanded a thorough investigation into the incident, labelling it a gross violation of military tradition. In a signed statement by his media adviser, Paul Ibe, Atiku expressed outrage over the event, calling it an aberration for any branch of the Armed Forces to organize a formal parade for a non-designated public figure. “It is with utter dismay and concern that Nigerians were subjected to a nauseating video circulating online, where a group of young men, armed and in full military procession, bestowed upon the President’s son unwarranted military honours,” the statement read. However, it has been revealed that the Nigerian Army is not behind the Quarter Guard salute in honour of Seyi Tinubu. A video currently trending online showed that Seyi Tinubu received a salute from the quarter guard on his arrival in Abeokuta, but the men in uniform in the video are not Nigerian soldiers. Instead, a group called Community Auxiliary Development & Effective Transformation Network has claimed responsibility for the parade. The former Vice-President further questioned the legitimacy of the military-like outfit involved, stating that the so-called group is not a recognized entity within the Nigerian Armed Forces. Atiku emphasized the disturbing fact that the name “Cadet,” associated with young, formally trained military personnel, was exploited by civilians to tarnish the esteemed traditions of the militaryAtiku has now called for an urgent investigation by all relevant security agencies to address critical concerns, including the legitimacy of the group behind the parade and the origin and legality of the firearms displayed. “If it is determined that any legal violations were committed by the President’s son or members of the so-called group, it is the constitutional duty of Nigerian security agencies to ensure that the law takes its course and those responsible are held accountable,” Atiku said.