# Tags

ON JUNE 12, WE STAND: TRAVAILS OF A REPORTER

By Paul Mumeh The June 12, 1993 Presidential Election in Nigeria is still a complex and multifaceted event, perceived differently by various individuals and groups. Just as the characteristics of an elephant can vary depending on the observer’s perspective, the significance and impact of that election are still subject to diverse interpretations. It is a story that will have no end. Nevertheless, there is a common denominator that unites Nigerians and foreigners alike; the federal military government’s decision to annul the election was widely condemned as unjust and unacceptable. It was totally unwarranted to every right-thinking member of the society. Troubling and devastating as the annulment appeared, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) summoned the courage to meet over the matter under the leadership of Chief Tony Anenih, who was then the National Chairman. The meeting was convened in Benin, the Edo State capital immediately after the annulment. It was held at Government House, otherwise called Dennis Osadebe House. Billed for 8pm, the meeting did not commence until the flag bearer, Chief M.K.O. Abiola, arrived with Alhaji Abubakar Rimi (both of blessed memories) at about 1am. All the SDP governors and leaders of the party were on hand. The atmosphere was tense, and Benin City was under siege. The meeting lasted till 7am the following day without a definite official statement. Inquisitive Journalists who had kept vigil while the meeting lasted had to ambush Chief Anenih and then National Secretary Sule Lamido for comments. They were initially reluctant to speak but unrelenting pressure forced Anenih and Lamido to summarise the deliberations at the parley in one sentence, “We are going to Abuja to meet with President Ibrahim Babangida to demand that he rescinds the decision annulling the election already won by the SDP’s Abiola… In a nutshell, On June 12 we stand”. That was exactly the headline of yours sincerely’s story as captured by the then newspaper giant, the Daily Times of Nigeria plc, on its back page. I remember vividly. It was expected that the political class should stand up to defend Abiola’s mandate. Curiously, the story changed and there was a U-turn after the Abuja meeting with Babangida. Instead of “on June 12, we stand,” the SDP delegation, without providing details, told Nigerians that “they now know better why the election was annulled.” The story continued to change as the initial protagonists became antagonists in the June 12 struggle. Scores of them began to lobby and indeed got juicy political appointments under the emerging military government of Abacha. From June 12, we stand it became on June 12, we chop by the same political class. Abiola was left in the cold wilderness, all alone. The awkward Nigerian system had initially sniffled life out of Abiola’s elegant wife, Kudirat, over the June 12 struggle. Civil societies, labour unions and Journalists took the gauntlet to fight for the actualisation of the June 12 mandate. By a twist of events, yours sincerely, who covered the election for the Daily Times stables in Benin as well as the first meeting of SDP after the annulment was arrested along with the then Vanguard Correspondent in Benin, Emmanuel Amaize, for allegedly publishing anti-government stories over June 12. Our offences were those storylines interrogated the police allegations that one of the fathers of Journalism in Nigeria and former Information Minister reputed for moving the motion for Nigeria’s independence in March 1953 Chief Anthony Enahoro was among those who sponsored the pro-June 12 riots that resulted in burning down former Chief of General Staff Admiral Augustus Aikhomu’s house in Irrua, two-time governor of old Bendel State Dr Samuel Ogbemudia’s properties in Benin and Chief Anenih’s Nova hotel in Benin. It would be recalled that at the time Enahoro was accused of sponsoring the June 12 riots, he was in detention on the orders of the powers that be in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, as the leader of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). How can a man in government custody in far away Port Harcourt be the mastermind of a riot in Benin?. That was our story, but then the government saw it differently and ordered our arrest and detention. The then Police Commissioner in Edo State, Hamisu Isa, as we were later told,d, was on instructions to move us from Benin to Abuja. But the protests from the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) led by then State chairman Comrade Nasamu Jacobson and NUJ lawyer, Chief Henry Ogbodu SAN halted the move. The police then charged us to court for, among other things, publishing stories likely to cause a breach of peace and opprobrium against the federal military government. The case dragged on for more than one year until it was struck out for lack of credible evidence. Babangida’s autobiography is ordinarily a good project for the records and contributes to the body of knowledge to enrich our political history. Above all, it is expected to heal the wounds of infamy and chat a road map for a better tomorrow. Whether the intents and purposes were met, judging by the uproar trailing the unveiling of the book “A Journey in Service”, is another kettle of fish entirely. A book of this nature authored by a man who has seen it all; the good, the bad and the ugly should ordinarily be conciliatory and reconciliatory to remedy injuries of yesterday and lay a smooth path for the future. Opinion differs but facts are sacred. For instance, some sordid details of that era or apportioning blame of that chequered history, especially to the dead who have no opportunity to reply, arguably lowered the bar. It adds no value to regurgitating over the past or missed opportunities. However, Babangida, as Commander-In-Chief of that era, has taken absolute responsibility for that annulment. He has apologised and, in his words, after taking stock of the June 12 debacle, said he would have done things differently. The past should serve as a useful guide for a better tomorrow. The armed forces, academicians, historians,

ABIOLA FAMILY SPEAKS OUT ON 1993 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ANNULMENT

Alhaji Lateef Kola Abiola, scion of the Bashorun MKO Abiola dynasty, has released a statement addressing the recent confirmation by former Military President General Ibrahim Babangida that Bashorun MKO Abiola won the 1993 presidential election. “It took the former Military President, General Ibrahim Babangida, an incredibly long 32 years to confirm what the whole world knew all along, that Bashorun MKO Abiola won the 1993 presidential election,” Abiola said. Abiola noted that the June 12 election goes beyond his family, affecting many other families who lost loved ones and suffered economic hardship due to the annulment. “As such, it is necessary that as a family, we take more than just a cursory look into the confirmation of known facts, but also the public’s response.” Abiola stated that he and many family members have decided to take more time before giving a substantive response. “Personally, having been an active participant in the campaign, the election and the subsequent struggle to protect the mandate, I wonder whether the question Nigerians should ask themselves is whether the country has learned any lessons from the tragic June 12 annulment. Frankly, I am not sure.”

IBB: A JOURNEY IN DISSERVICE

By Lemmy Ughegbe General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) has long been nicknamed Nigeria’s “Maradona” for his adept political manoeuvring, often sidestepping accountability for impactful decisions. Babangida, however, surpassed himself in Chapter 12 of A Journey in Service, not by confessing to the annulment of the June 12, 1993, election, but by rewriting history without shame. Instead of owning up to his actions in undermining Nigerians and saying sorry, he blamed General Sani Abacha, Chief MKO Abiola, and Professor Humphrey Nwosu—all deceased—for the election’s nullification.It is an extraordinary act of self-preservation cloaked in deception. Babangida alleges Abacha circumvented him during the annulment, exceeding his authority. However, he held the positions of Head of State, Commander-in-Chief, and ultimate authority when Nigeria overturned its most democratic election. The easy targeting of the deceased Abacha is a cowardly act and a blatant misrepresentation of history. Even more tragically, he tries to pin some of the blame on Abiola, whose mandate he stole, claiming Abiola’s political decisions led to the annulment. He writes, “There were claims that Abiola had compiled a list of military officers to retire upon assumption of office, and this caused apprehension within the ranks.” This is gaslighting at its worst—a desperate attempt to manufacture justification for a blatant act of electoral robbery. Adding insult to injury, Babangida ludicrously accused NEC Chairman Professor Humphrey Nwosu of deliberately stopping the election results announcement. He wrote, “Professor Nwosu, in his wisdom, chose to stop the announcement of results, which unfortunately led to further confusion.” This is as ludicrous as it is ridiculous. Nwosu performed his constitutional duties under a regime with absolute authority over the process. Nigerians’ intelligence is insulted by the suggestion of the electoral commission’s independent power to end such a vital national event, disregarding the military government. Babangida’s government, which had already planned the annulment, put immense pressure and intimidation on Nwosu.Babangida’s true intentions regarding democracy become clearer when we consider his long-standing use of “Khalifa,” meaning successor, to refer to Abacha.What was the point of the election if Babangida had selected an heir apparent? Babangida’s whole transition programme is now tainted by this revelation. This implies his intention was to prevent the June 12 election, misleading Nigerians to simulate a democratic handover while secretly preserving military rule.Babangida’s claim to accept responsibility is a cleverly disguised linguistic trick. In one breath, he declares, “I regrettably take responsibility.” Yet, in another, he couches it with justifications, saying the annulment was necessary for national security. This is not a confession; it is an elaborate performance aimed at avoiding true accountability. If Babangida was genuinely taking responsibility, he would have boldly declared, “I am responsible for the annulment.” He would have apologised to Nigerians, to the families of those who lost their lives in the aftermath of June 12, and to history itself. But no such thing happened.Instead, a tragicomic scene played out in Nigeria during his book and library launch; the country’s powerful elite celebrated a man who had committed the political crime of the century. Ironically, over ₦17 billion was raised at the launch, a reward for the man responsible for one of Nigeria’s darkest chapters. Ironically, the man who subverted the people’s will through high treason was later lauded for his actions. The account in A Journey in Service is riddled with contradictions from Babangida. In one instance, he claims he was helpless in preventing the annulment because of military pressure. Yet, he also states, “I wanted a smooth transition to a democratic government, but circumstances beyond my control dictated otherwise.” Why didn’t he stand strong against these alleged circumstances if he was committed to democracy? Why did he not resist the forces that sought to undermine the democratic process? His words expose him as not a leader bound by external forces, but a man lacking the courage to follow through on his promises of change. The truth remains, regardless of book launches, crafted excuses, or political gatherings, as history demonstrates. This was IBB’s chance to admit his offenses against Nigeria and its people, seek pardon, and even offer restitution. Instead, he danced on the graves of Abiola, Abacha, and the countless Nigerians who lost their lives because of the crisis he unleashed. The legendary footballer Diego Armando Maradona dribbled his way to immortality in the annals of football. However, this time, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, dubbed Nigeria’s Maradona, sidestepped redemption, prioritising cowardice and deceit over courage and truth. History shall not be kind to him. Lemmy Ughegbe, Ph. D writes from AbujaEmail: lemmyughegbeofficial@gmail.comWhatsApp ONLY: +2348069716645

BABANGIDA FINALLY ADMITS ABIOLA WON 1993 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

In a shocking revelation, former military head of state, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, has finally acknowledged that the late Chief Moshood Abiola won the June 12, 1993, presidential election. This admission comes over three decades after the election, which was infamously annulled by Babangida’s regime. Babangida made this revelation in his autobiography, “A Journey in Service”, which was launched in Abuja on Thursday. Through the book reviewer and former Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osibanjo, Babangida stated that Abiola secured the majority of votes and the geographical spread required to be declared president. “There was no doubt in my mind; MKO Abiola won the election. He satisfied all the requirements,” Babangida said. The former military ruler described the June 12 election annulment as the most challenging aspect of his life. However, he expressed happiness that President Muhammadu Buhari acknowledged Abiola’s victory and honoured him with the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) title, Nigeria’s highest national honour. Babangida’s admission is a significant development in Nigeria’s history, as it confirms what many had long believed: that Abiola won the election fair and square. This revelation is expected to spark renewed discussions about Nigeria’s past and its ongoing struggle for democracy.