# Tags

BENUE STATE BLOODSHED DEMANDS JUSTICE, NOT EMPTY PROMISES

By Augustine Eigbe, Ph.D The charred villages and mass graves in Benue State stand as grim monuments to the failure of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution’s Section 14(2)(b), which promised that ‘the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.’ The constitutional mandate degenerates into cruel satire amid the state’s unrelenting bloodshed. Coordinated terrorist and bandit attacks slaughter villagers, forcibly displacing thousands from their ancestral homelands. These killings are the direct result of a systemic failure to uphold the most basic function of government. It mirrors the constitution’s duality, noble on paper yet dysfunctional in practice. What makes these killings particularly unconscionable is their predictability. The constitutional mandate of ‘public safety’ has been overtaken by an unsurprising cycle of impunity where warnings go ignored, perpetrators remain unpunished, and mass burials become normalised. The systematic extermination of families in their homes, the burning of children alive, and the forced displacement of entire communities cannot be characterised as farmers and herders ‘clashes.’ These constitute crimes against humanity exhibiting genocidal patterns. This cycle has repeated for years, and each time the government pledges to ‘bring perpetrators to justice,’ but not a single high-profile prosecution has occurred. Instead, victims watch as killers walk free, shielded by a broken justice system. This is not merely a governance failure or breakdown; it constitutes moral dereliction, as the government’s inaction embeds complicity. The bloodstained soil of Benue State demands justice, not empty platitudes. True reconciliation cannot grow from the shallow soil of political rhetoric. It requires the government to act, unequivocally fulfilling its constitutional duty to security and justice. The people of the state need no more promises; they need proof that their government values their lives. Reconciliation demands action, not press statements. The mass murderers must face justice, displaced farmers must return safely, and killers’ sponsors must be exposed. Otherwise, the wounds will remain indelible for generations to come. Without justice for the rivers of blood spilled across its villages, the state can achieve no true reconciliation: no healing, no closure, no peace. These massacres transcend mere tragedy; they are crimes against humanity that demand swift prosecution through the justice system. There can be no reconciliation while the architects of these atrocities remain free to plot the next round of killings.True peace cannot be built upon unmarked graves and unpunished crimes.Justice delayed has become justice denied through a cruel cycle of violence and empty rhetoric by the government. The path to sincere reconciliation must begin with uncompromising truth. It must be acknowledged that these are not spontaneous clashes between farmers and herders, but rather coordinated campaigns of terror by marauding killers. Until the government protects all Nigerians equally, prosecutes perpetrators decisively, and ensures displaced families return safely, true reconciliation will remain historical fiction, its promise nothing but an insult to the dead and betrayal of the living. Augustine Eigbe, Ph.D, ANIPR is historian and development communication expert.Email: augustineeigbe20022002@gmail.com

A NATIONAL TRAGEDY AT UROMI

By Adams Abonu When that any nation that puts emotions ahead of constitutional provisions was a nation in peril, little did he know that his postulation would reverberate at the heart of Africa centuries later. Nigeria has been a nation beleaguered by an unending circle of violence, often triggered by mob emotions that take no cognizance of our laws. This is how last Thursday’s unfortunate tragedy at Uromi in Edo State comes into perspective. In a most bizarre manner bereft of any sense of humanity, over a dozen travelers were lynched and burnt to death by a ragtag vigilante group over suspicions that they were kidnappers. Reportedly, the travelers, who claimed to be hunters enroute to Kano from Port-Harcourt, were found with dane guns, machetes and sundry weapons capable of considerable harm. In a frenzy, they were not given any chance to further prove their innocence as a mob descended on them and eventually burnt most of them to death to the horrific consternation of anyone with a shred of conscience. That tragic incident at Uromi was a national tragedy; a blight to our collective identity, however it’s inexcusable similitude with past ugly incidences. This has further exposed the mutual suspicions among sections of the country while also depicting the extent at which human lives amount to little in a country grappling with a perpetual identity crises. Before mundane faultlines are drawn on the religion and ethnicity of the victims of this tragedy, the sanctity of human life should be accorded paramountly. Before being considered Muslims or Fulanis, they were human beings, who were entitled to be given a fair hearing at the face of any allegations against them. Those making the futile case of what “Northerners with dane guns were doing in the South” are on a path of acrimony, driven by the bile in their being. Assuming, that the victims were truly suspected to be kidnappers in an era rife with kidnappings and several manifestations of insecurity, there’s no where in the Nigerian constitution that suggested that anyone suspected of such criminality be put to death in the most horrendous manner without being properly tried in a court of competent jurisdiction. When elements within the body polity take laws into their hands in such brazen manner, it calls for a rethinking of our commonwealth. While nothing could be done to assuage the trauma inflicted on our sensibilities by this tragedy, recent condemnations from public and personal quarters are in good order. The Presidency, the Inspector-General of Police, the Northern Governors Forum, religious bodies and the civil society have risen to this unfortunate occasion and reacted sternly. There seems to be an overwhelming consensus of of condemnation, and rightly so. But these acts of brigandage and ‘jungle justices’ must be discountenanced from our national life. Be it the gruesome stoning to death of a certain Deborah in Sokoto in 2021 for alleged blasphemy, the lynching of a woman preaching near a mosque in Kubwa or this particular case, there must be conscious efforts to prevent these acts of violence. The onus is on Nigerian authorities to unmask those behind this national tragedy and put steps on the ground to combat insecurity within our borders. A counter that aspires to lead the black race cannot afford to be perceived as another abode for anarchy. May the soul of those who lost their lives at Uromi and those whom Nigeria happened to them and ended their lives tragically find eternal rest. Abonu, a multimedia journalist, writes from Asokoro, Abuja.

EDO NUJ CONDEMNS ATTACK ON JOURNALISTS BY DSS OPERATIVES

The Chairman, Edo NUJ, Dr. Festus Alenkhe, and the Secretary, Edo NUJ, Andy Egbon, in a statement, have strongly condemned the unwarranted attack on journalists by officials of the Department of State Services (DSS) at the Edo State Election Petition Tribunal sitting on Monday, January 20, 2025. The attempt to bar journalists from performing their constitutional duties is a blatant assault on press freedom and the fundamental right of citizens to information and free speech. Dr. Alenkhe and Egbon described the actions of the DSS operatives as “unacceptable” and a clear indication of the growing hostility towards the media in Nigeria. They called on the Director-General of the DSS and the Edo State Director of the service to take immediate steps to caution their personnel and prevent future occurrences. The Edo NUJ leadership stood in solidarity with their colleagues who were harassed and intimidated by the DSS operatives, demanding an unconditional apology to the NUJ and an assurance that journalists will be allowed to perform their duties without hindrance. Failure to comply, the union threatened to take further steps, including boycotting activities of the organization in Edo State. Andy Egbon emphasized that the Nigeria Union of Journalists, Edo State Council, will continue to advocate for press freedom and the protection of journalists’ rights. “We urge all stakeholders to join us in condemning this brazen attack on democracy and the free press,” Dr. Alenkhe added.