ELON MUSK DEPARTS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AFTER TURBULENT CHAPTER
Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has announced his departure from his role as a top adviser to President Donald Trump, marking the end of a tumultuous chapter in Washington. Musk’s role, which focused on reducing and overhauling the federal bureaucracy through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), was always intended to be temporary. In a post on X, Musk thanked President Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending, saying, “The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.” A White House official confirmed Musk’s departure. Musk’s exit comes after he expressed frustration with the Trump administration’s legislative agenda, particularly the “big beautiful bill,” which includes tax cuts and enhanced immigration enforcement. Musk described the bill as a “massive spending bill” that increases the federal deficit and undermines the work of DOGE. “I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,” Musk said. “But I don’t know if it could be both.” Trump defended his agenda, citing the delicate politics involved in negotiating the legislation. “I’m not happy about certain aspects of it, but I’m thrilled by other aspects of it,” he said. “We’re going to see what happens. It’s got a way to go.” Some Republican lawmakers share Musk’s concerns about the bill. Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson sympathized with Musk’s frustration, saying he was “pretty confident” there was enough opposition to slow down the process until the president and leadership get serious about reducing spending. During his time in the administration, Musk struggled to achieve his goals, dramatically reducing his target for cutting spending from $2 trillion to $150 billion. He also clashed with other top officials and faced fierce political blowback. Musk’s departure is seen as a potential boost to Republicans who want bigger spending cuts. Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee reposted a Fox News story about Musk’s interview, saying there was “still time to fix” the bill. “The Senate version will be more aggressive,” Lee said. “It can, it must, and it will be. Or it won’t pass.” The Congressional Budget Office estimates the tax provisions in the bill would increase federal deficits by $3.8 trillion over the decade, while the changes to Medicaid, food stamps, and other services would reduce spending by slightly more than $1 trillion. House Republican leaders claim increased economic growth would allow the bill to be deficit-neutral or deficit-reducing, but outside watchdogs are skeptical.