# Tags

COURT ADMITS VIDEO EVIDENCE IN NNAMDI KANU’S TRIAL

The Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted three video clips, including one showing Nnamdi Kanu inspecting a Radio Biafra transmitter, in the trial of the Biafra nation agitator. The court is currently conducting a trial-within-trial to determine whether Kanu’s statements were made under duress. The Department of State Services (DSS) has faulted Kanu’s claims that he made statements under duress. A DSS operative, known as Mr CCC, testified that Kanu was given presidential treatment and denied allegations of using force to extract statements from him. Kanu had claimed that a DSS operative named Mr Brown threatened him with solitary confinement to extract statements. However, the witness clarified that the officers who took part in the interview were James, Ibrahim, and Collins, with no Mr Brown among them. The court admitted three written statements made by Kanu on October 23rd, 24th, and November 4th, 2015, as well as video recordings of his oral statements on October 21 and 23, 2015. Justice James Omotosho ruled that the court would determine the admissibility of the statements after the trial-within-trial. In the video footage played in court, Kanu admitted to being the founder and director of Radio Biafra and claimed that the Biafra cause enjoys funding across the globe. The judge adjourned the matter till May 29 for continuation of the hearing and to deliver a ruling on the admissibility of the statements. Kanu testified in his own defense, claiming that he was struck by a DSS operative when he was picked up in Lagos in 2015. However, the operative later apologized on their way to the airport en route to Abuja. The case continues.

FEDERAL HIGH COURT CLASHES WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OVER NNAMDI KANU TRIAL

The Federal High Court in Abuja has issued a stern warning to the Federal Government over its lack of progress in the trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). The presiding judge expressed frustration at the prosecution’s repeated delays and seeming lack of readiness, saying, “You must pick six days within two weeks and present all your witnesses. If you fail to do so, I will strike out your case as weak.” The judge’s ultimatum drew a mixture of murmurs and gasps from those present in the courtroom. The prosecution’s second witness was cross-examined, but his testimony was deemed unreliable and he was eventually dismissed by the court. The prosecution’s failure to present its next witness further frustrated the judge, who adjourned proceedings to May 28, 29, and June 6, 16, 18, and 19, 2025. The judge urged the prosecution to reduce its extensive list of witnesses, saying, “We cannot continue like this. Reduce your witnesses so this matter can end soon.” The defense team, led by Chief Kanu Agabi, introduced video footage intended to challenge the legitimacy of the charges against Kanu. The footage included Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma’s comments that may have suggested political factors influenced unrest in Orlu. The prosecution’s witness refrained from commenting on the footage, while the defense questioned him on the lack of direct evidence linking Kanu to criminal activity. The witness conceded that he had never personally investigated IPOB members and had no reports linking Kanu to violence. The judge’s warning highlights the court’s growing impatience with the prosecution’s handling of the case. The trial is set to continue on the designated dates, with the prosecution expected to present its witnesses and make progress in the case.

OPENING STATEMENTS BEGIN IN SEAN ‘DIDDY’ COMBS SEX-TRAFFICKING TRIAL AS PROSECUTION PAINTS HIM AS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE LEADER

The high-profile sex-trafficking trial of hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs kicked off in New York with opening statements, as prosecutors accused him of running a criminal enterprise involving kidnapping, drugging, and coercing women into sex over two decades. Combs faces charges including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison. Prosecutor Emily A. Johnson outlined the government’s case to the jury, alleging Combs operated a criminal network with the help of bodyguards and staff. She detailed disturbing accusations, including an incident where Combs allegedly broke into a man’s home after discovering his ex-partner, R&B singer Cassie Ventura, was seeing someone else. “He beat her brutally,” Johnson told the court. The prosecution further claimed Combs forced Ventura to have sex with male escorts and later blackmailed her with footage of the encounters. Combs, who has denied all charges and rejected a plea deal, sat quietly in court wearing a grey suit and glasses. His defense team, led by high-profile attorney Marc Agnifilo, includes Teny Geragos, daughter of celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos. Agnifilo, known for defending controversial figures like cult leader Keith Raniere, will aim to counter the prosecution’s narrative. The trial has drawn intense media attention, with crowds gathering outside the courthouse. Inside, spectators included Combs’ family members—his children Chance, D’Lila, Justin, Quincy, and his mother Janice—as well as lawyers representing other high-profile cases, such as Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom. Judge Arun Subramanian, presiding over the case, instructed jurors to remain impartial and avoid outside discussions about the trial. The jury, finalized after delays, consists of eight men and four women, with six alternates. Prosecutors argued Combs used his business empire to conceal drug and sex crimes, while the defense accused them of targeting Black jurors during selection. The prosecution defended its strikes, citing potential biases among dismissed jurors. As the trial unfolds, witnesses and victims are expected to testify, with Cassie Ventura likely playing a central role. Combs’ legal team maintains his innocence, with spokesperson Holly Baird stating he is “upbeat and ready for his side of the story to be told.” The case continues to captivate the public, marking a dramatic fall for the music icon once celebrated for shaping hip-hop culture.

KANU’S TERRORISM TRIAL CONTINUES: WITNESS TESTIFIES AGAINST BIAFRA AGITATOR

The trial of Biafra nation agitator, Nnamdi Kanu, continued with the testimony of the second prosecution witness, who identified Kanu as the founder of the Eastern Security Network (ESN) and operator of Radio Biafra. The witness, referred to as BBB, testified that he was assigned by the then Attorney General of the Federation to investigate Kanu. During the hearing, the prosecution attempted to tender a letter authorizing the investigation, but the defense counsel, Kanu Agabi, objected on grounds that the document was not front-loaded. The prosecution subsequently withdrew the document, and the court ordered that all materials intended for the trial must be served in advance and listed properly. The presiding judge, James Omotosho, also addressed a matter of confusion regarding legal representation, where a certain Charles Ude claimed to be a member of Kanu’s legal team. However, Agabi disassociated the team from Ude’s claim, and Kanu confirmed that Agabi remains his official legal representative. In another development, the court barred a relative of the defendant, Favour Kanu, from attending three successive proceedings of the court after she admitted to doing a live stream while the judge was seated and posting the content online. The matter was adjourned to May 7 for the continuation of the examination-in-chief of the second prosecution witness.

WITNESSES TO TESTIFY BEHIND SCREEN IN NNAMDI KANU’S TERRORISM TRIAL AS FG OPENS CASE

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has agreed to allow the federal government’s witnesses to testify behind a screen in the alleged terrorism trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). The judge granted the permission in a bid to conceal the identities of the witnesses for security reasons. The federal government’s lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo SAN, had argued that the witnesses’ identities needed to be protected due to the nature of the charges against Kanu, which borders on terrorism. Awomolo requested that the witnesses be shielded from the public for the same reason, and the judge granted the request. Kanu’s counsel, Kanu Agabi, did not object to the application but requested similar cooperation from the federal government when arguing Kanu’s bail application. The first witness, code-named PWAAA, has commenced testifying as the government formally opened its case against Kanu.